Dooley Blog

Nobody plans to have Dementia

Monday, April 23, 2012

Estate Planning has become somewhat of a taboo topic in today’s society. No one wants to talk about what happens when you are no longer able to make decisions or unfortunately, it is discussed when it's too late to be able to make a choice. A recent article published in the Sydney Morning Herald on 29 March 2012 reported that dementia rates are set to soar and as such that it is imperative that more Australians plan as to what is to happen when they can no longer manage their health care, end-of-life care, or financial affairs.

It was reported that only about 55 per cent of Australians have a will, and an even smaller proportion have prepared Enduring Guardianships, Powers of Attorney or Health Care Directives recording their wishes.

It is imperative that you ensure that you plan for your future needs when you are able to make a well informed choice. This is the only way that you can ensure that your wishes are carried out and that your loved ones are protected.

The report reveals a looming dementia epidemic for NSW, with the number of people with the condition set to increase from 95,000 to 303,500 by 2050. A separate analysis shows the electorates expected to be most affected include Tweed, Port Macquarie, Myall Lakes, Bega, Wyong and Port Stephens, with projected increases of up to 400 per cent.

If you would like to stand out from the crowd and start planning for the future to ensure that you have make your wishes clear and binding then and provide protection for your loved ones, call us at Dooley & Associates and we will be able to assist you with any of your Estate planning needs, such as drafting of Wills, Power of Attorney, Enduring Guardianship and Health Care directives.

Plus one coding for blog post –

Employing those with mental illness: Who really has the problem?

Friday, October 14, 2011
Mental illness is a condition which affects many Australian families. According to statistics, almost one in five (20%) Australians experience some form of mental illness each year. Although there is a general lack of understanding about mental illness in the broader community, it has not stopped people from making quick assumptions and prejudgments about it and those it affects. Studies show that there is a widely held misconception about the capacities of those with mental illness, particularly in an employment context as employees and indeed potential employees. ii

The Misconception

The problem lies with the misconception, which experts say result from a lack of education and understanding about mental illness. iii This then translates into assumptions and negative stereotypes developed by the broader community based on inconclusive evidence. In no other area do these assumptions and stereotypes impact mental illness sufferers more than in the workplace.

The Workplace

Government commentators say that people who have mental illness face the highest degree of stigmatisation in the workplace and the greatest barriers to employment opportunities. iv The reason for this is because employers and workplace managers (as members of the broader community) make wrongful assumptions that employees or potential employees with mental illness will not be able to perform the job well or, at least, not as productively and efficiently as another candidate without such a condition.

This results in the following negative implications (to name a few):

 

  • Increased barriers to entry for candidates with mental illness;

  • Candidates with mental illness not fully disclosing their condition to their employer or potential employer;

  • No proper workplace policies and procedure to cater for those who have a mental illness;

  • Lack of flexible conditions to assist those with mental illness; and

  • Bullying and harassment in the workplace.

The reality of the situation is that people with mental illness, or at least being honest about their condition, are being denied opportunities to work based simply on a negative stereotype with nothing to do with their actual attributes, skills and abilities. It begs the question, who really has the problem? The person suffering from mental illness, or the stereotypical manager?

The Problem: Who has it?

What employers and managers should understand is that the issue is the actual mental illness itself and not the person it is affecting. Viewing the situation in any other way has the potential to cause significant ethical and legal implications for an employer or manager.

Like any other medical condition, mental illness is manageable and treatable with the right approach. Researchers say that those receiving effective treatment and management have been found to make very good employees.v In fact, those suffering mental illness have been found to have the capacity to work even harder than others, be more loyal and take less sick days due to their greater motivation to work hard and their high value of work in general.

Accordingly, employers and managers should be aware that like other employees and candidates, those with mental illness do have the potential and capabilities to work well in all sorts of situations. To rule them out based solely on an unfounded assumption and undermine their potential and capabilities based on negative stereotypes shows that the real problem lies with employers and managers and not with actual sufferers.

The solution

Employers and managers must ensure that each employee and potential employee, especially those with a mental illness, are given a fair-go, respect and the necessary protection they deserve in the workplace.

Employers and managers can achieve this by:

  • educating and making themselves aware of mental illness issues, particularly in the workplace environment;

  • detaching themselves from their subjective thoughts and being more objective during the hiring process focusing primarily on experience, skill and ability;

  • implementing appropriate workplace policies and procedures to assist employees with mental illness;

  • encouraging frequent dialogue and discussion with mental illness sufferers, treating them as experts of their condition and listening to ways they may be assisted better;

  • ensuring flexible working arrangements to help manage mental illness;

  • protection from harassment and bullying in the workplace;

  • encouraging disclosure of mental illness as a way to assist in the development of the individual in the workplace; and

  • never assuming.

By actively working towards achieving the above goals, employers will ensure that they are doing all they can to assist their current employees with mental illness, cut down on the wrongful assumptions and stereotypes, provide opportunities to well deserving people willing to work hard, disclose and manage their mental illness, whilst building a successful business and meeting proper legal standards and practices.

i. Australian Bureau of Statistics 2003, Disability, Ageing and Carers: Summary of Findings, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, viewed 11 October 2011, <http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/4430.02003?OpenDocument>.
iiKnox, Jo ‘Don’t make assumptions about employees with mental illness’, Hr Daily, 5 September 2011.
iii. Ibid.
iv.  JobAccess Australia Government, ‘Working with people with disability’, viewed 11 October 2011. <http://jobaccess.gov.au/Coworkers/Working_with_people_with_disability/How_to_work_with_people_with_disability/Pages/Talkingaboutmentalillness.aspx>.
v. Knox, Jo, above n ii.
 


RSS Recent Posts


Tags

Pro Bono Legal Panel Twitter Will Awareness Week directors responsibilities Citizen of the Year Norwest double demerits banks traffic home purchase international public holidays contractors separation ATO mortgage driver reviver ACCC living will, codicil divorce blacklisted properties business financial awareness parenting environment and business redundancy payments charity sex discrimination advanced health care directive energy efficient risks Centrelink Parramatta getting ready to leave emergency contacts tax mortgages community NSW Young Lawyers First Home Owners Grant Hills District underpayment caveat mediation Australia Day Awards Consent Orders entitlements stamp duty RTA long weekend family law workshop estate planning public holidays relocation grant neighbourhood disputes CEO Program Save Our Sons australian tax office Paid Parental Leave Christmas online promotions Pro Bono Resources Centre Family Courts of Australia online shopping mimimum wage first home buyers sham contracts marriage reverse mortgage carbon tax firearms top tips Breakfast Briefing Series welfare fraud age discrimination mental health issues seminar credit card maternity leave commercial law terms and conditions law week social networking succession planning revenge criminal law strata reports advice St Michael's Family Centre business law Binding Financial Agreement paternity leave family business safe jobs finances government grant welfare superannuation Fair Work Australia relocation of Parramatta office drive safe employment law conveyancing Young Lawyers debt recovery discrimination DUI Facebook custody community involvement keeping in touch days guardianship Phoenix companies directorship speeding power of attorney debt fencing disputes witnessing of documents FWO rate of pay long service leave Parental Leave animal safety ID requirements lost super Q&A's Age Discrimination Commissioner Anzac Day pest and building inspections will police de facto relationships insurance older workers credit award system property law events business health check

Archive